The No-hawk Occupation of Occupy Toronto
By Jacqueline S. Homan, author: Classism For Dimwits and Divine Right
Two Aboriginal men and one Scottish trouble-maker claiming to be Mohawk warriors really did it this time. Jayson Fleury, a Saulteaux-Cree from the O’Chiese reserve in Alberta who lived most of his life in Vancouver, told news reporters on the first day of Occupy Toronto that he was a “Mohawk from Alberta.” He claimed to be a “Mohawk warrior” and that as an Aboriginal he/his group did not need a fire permit from the City of Toronto for starting an open flame fire in St. James Park in the Occupy Toronto camp. Fleury said that he and his fellow “warriors”, Rick MacRae and John Fox were “planning to have a sacred fire, to keep everybody’s hearts warm.” Several anonymous donors already dropped off plenty of firewood. The gesture sounds nice on the surface and one can be easily swayed by Fleury’s good looks and magnetic charm, but there are several problems here.
Even though a small fortune for a permit and a myriad of bureaucratic forms are required by the city for all Aboriginals wishing to have a small sacred fire as a vital part of their ceremonies at their sacred sites, many which are located in Toronto’s High Park, have had to abide by these public park bylaws or else their sacred fires would be abruptly and unceremonially extinguished. Yet, Jayson Fleury incorrectly told news reporters that “Aboriginals don’t need permits for their sacred fires.”
According to a Facebook IM chat from Krystalline Kraus, the Aboriginal liaison facilitator for Occupy Toronto, Jayson Fleury lied to her by promising her he would not light any sacred fire without a legitimate Mohawk elder being present in keeping with territorial protocols and custom. But when Kraus had to leave the camp for a doctor appointment, Fleury lit the fire anyway — inside his tent/tarp structure, less than 6 feet away from bales of straw and other flammables. This was after he accepted an offering of tobacco from Kraus to honor her request that he not light the fire.
In most Aboriginal communities across North America, tobacco is regarded as a sacred medicine offering and if the recipient cannot grant what the giver of the tobacco is asking, they must refuse to accept the tobacco. Since Jayson accepted Krystalline’s offering of tobacco, he was obligated to grant her request by holding off on lighting any sacred fire. But this is not the only protocol that Jayson Fleury violated.
As a Saulteaux-Cree, he lied to reporters and everyone else at Occupy Toronto in claiming to be a “Mohawk from Alberta” and saying that he was a “Mohawk warrior” when he is neither. This sort of thing has caused residual problems for the real Mohawks and the rest of the Iroquois Confederacy nations as well. Jayson Fleury’s misrepresentation of himself splashed across the major news media outlets in Canada and the US — as did his claim that Aboriginals don’t need permits for sacred fires in public parks. Apparently, the City of Toronto does not enforce its own laws uniformly as other Aboriginal groups have had their sacred fires put out by the police and fire department if they could not produce proof of the requisite permit.
If Aboriginals don’t need a fire permit, then the City of Toronto owes several Aboriginal groups some huge refunds for all the permit fees over the years that they had to fork over for their religious ceremonies at their sacred sites and burial mounds in High Park for a tiny two-stick fire for offering up tobacco as part of their prayers. But the issue of selective enforcement and fire permits is not the only problem here.
Ezra Levant of Sun Media, the Canadian equivalent of America’s Fox News, fomented public panic and racially motivated hatred when he said that “Mohawk warriors took over Occupy Toronto and Torontonians should brace themselves for “an urban Oka” — referring to the famous dispute between the Mohawks of Kanesatake and the town of Oka, Quebec, Canada which began on July 11, 1990 and lasted until September 26, 1990. At least one person died as a result. The Oka Crisis was the culmination of a dispute when the town of Oka proceeded to expand its municipal golf course onto Mohawk lands, known as “the Pines”, which contain a Mohawk cemetery.
Out of all the First Nations communities, the Mohawks are disproportionately singled out and targeted by police and for negative publicity in the press. Non-Indigenous reporters like Joe Warmington of the Toronto Sun took it at face value when Jayson Fleury, sporting a Mohawk warrior flag, claimed to be a Mohawk warrior from Alberta and that Rick MacRae (who is Scottish) and John Fox (an Ojibwe and head of AIM Ontario) were also Mohawk warriors.
Had Joe Warmington done a cursory 2-second Google search on Jayson Fleury and John Fox, whose AIM flag was present at the camp, Warmington would have seen that Jayson Fleury is a Saulteaux-Cree whose younger sister, Mona Wilson, was the final victim of Port Coquitlam, BC serial killer Robert “Willie” Pickton. He would have also seen that John Fox is the outspoken Ojibwe activist dedicated to pursuing justice for the 60’s Scoop survivors and other victims of cultural disruption courtesy of Canada’s Children’s Aid Society. Instead, Joe Warmington ran with the story that all three men were “Mohawk warriors” who took over the Occupy Toronto movement. This has already produced a backlash from many in the non-Native community who are still seething with resentment over the Oka crisis and the most recent incident in Caledonia.
Warmington made inferences to Ipperwash and Caledonia in his October 26th article in the Toronto Sun, and implied that Aboriginals get too many special privileges at the expense of other Canadians — like having an open fire in a public park without a permit, which not only costs a lot of money but is also a real bureaucratic hassle to get. This has raised a lot of resentment from non-Aboriginals who often take out their frustrations on Aboriginal people, escalating racial tensions between communities where the Aboriginal community usually gets the worst of it.
The Toronto Sun article insinuated that Aboriginal culture and spiritual practices and beliefs are all just a ruse to pull one over on the public, saying, “a First Nations sacred fire that no one will have the guts to extinguish” means that the public won’t have access to the park and that the park will be destroyed — and all that will be the fault of the “Mohawk warriors” of course, who “declared St. James Park to be sacred ground” with signage, and that “the next Ipperwash or Caledonia could happen right in downtown Toronto.”
Many readers weighed in with their comments to Warmington’s article online. They called for police repression on Aboriginals, calling them “militants” who think they can do whatever they like and claiming that Aboriginals get everything handed to them on a silver spoon. YouTube posters responding to Ezra Levant’s televised rant oozed with toxic vitriol, calling for “cowboys to saddle up” and “scalp” the Indians. This is the kind of heat and negative public opinion that is coming down on the real Mohawks and by extension, other Iroquoian nations of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy and against all Aboriginals in general — all because of three socially imbecilic miscreants who aren’t Mohawks but who are claiming to be.
As a result, selective enforcement by the police can be counted on to target Iroquois-operated smoke shops while turning a blind eye to renegade unlicensed archeologists who traffic Indigenous cultural property across Canadian borders to various universities and museums, and who submit fraudulent reports to the Ministry of Culture to aid greedy land developers and mining interests in grabbing more Aboriginal lands from all Aboriginal communities for profit-making ventures that have had a deleterious effect on the environment and on the whole of society.
It’s bad enough that the Mohawks get bum-rapped for their own justifiable resistances against land theft and other injustices. They shouldn’t have to suffer more because of No-hawks who misrepresent themselves as Mohawks. So now that every major news media outlet across North America has picked this story up and ran with it, everyone who is not “in the know” regarding Jayson Fleury and Rick MacRae has it all wrong about Aboriginals and Occupy Toronto participants.
The Three Stooges — Aboriginal Style
Rick MacRae, the self-proclaimed “Mohawk elder” is not recognized as a Mohawk under Mohawk tradition and custom. Like Jewish tradition, one’s Mohawkness is determined matrilineally. Rick MacRae’s mother was a Scottish war bride. He made no secret about feeling resentful that he was not recognized as a Mohawk, and had previously told others that he was an Iroquois elder and a “backwards medicine man.” He had been gently corrected several times over the past year or so by elders and Clanmothers in the Iroquois community. But he is stubborn. This is not the first time that MacRae has caused problems for the Haudenosaunee, the Mohawks in particular. Rick MacRae has clashed with other Aboriginal activists because he always wants to be the boss, and life just does not always work out that way.
Nor was this current brouhaha over a sacred fire the first for MacRae. This past May in the High Park peace and restoration camp, he refused to listen to the Haudenosaunee community regarding another sacred fire incident. The peace camp was temporarily set up in High Park at the Snake Mounds — an ancient Iroquoian burial mound — to dismantle illegal BMX dirt jumps and keep vigilance and restore the site until the Parks and Forestry Dept. put up a fence to safeguard the area. Rick MacRae started a sacred fire, but did not follow instructions from Haudenosaunee elders and repeatedly argued with their persons of authority over such matters and they had no choice but to eventually call the cops to escort him out of the peace camp because he was disruptive. They also forbade him from conducting any more sacred fires or ceremonies on Haudenosaunee sacred sites — a directive that Rick MacRae disregarded when he conducted an unauthorized ceremony at Tabor Hill on October 16th, using an expired fire permit from 2010 that had previously been issued to the Taiaiako’n Historical Preservation Society.
Now, MacRae is embroiled in another sacred fire mishap in a tiny park at the Occupy Toronto camp. Since Toronto sits within Haudenosaunee territory, which spans from southern Ontario to upstate New York, most of Pennsylvania, part of the Ohio Valley, and reaching as far south as Mingo County, West Virginia, there are protocols that must be followed regarding sacred fires that are lit by someone claiming to speak for the Iroquois peoples. Some people apparently think that the rules don’t apply to them.
Jayson Fleury comes from a long proud lineage of Saulteaux-Cree medicine people. His mother, Linda Bigjohn, was very well-respected among the Cree, Saulteaux, and Blackfoot as a medicine woman. Jayson inherited strong medicine from her. His Cree medicine was apparently strong enough to charm the pants off the Toronto cops: He convinced them into letting him have a “sacred fire” as a “Mohawk warrior” at the Occupy encampment without a permit — even though there are bales of straw all around and huddles of tents and blankets in close proximity to one another, which makes St. James Park a big tinderbox that could easily ignite, resulting in utter catastrophe. If such a disaster happens, it will probably be unjustly blamed on the real Mohawks because Jayson Fleury told news reporters that he was a “Mohawk from Alberta” and a “Mohawk warrior” even though he is neither. He’s a Saulteaux-Cree storyteller. And this time, he told one hell of a whopper.
But Jayson Fleury has a history of telling whoppers. After his younger sister, Mona Wilson, was found in pieces at serial killer Robert “Willie” Pickton’s pig farm, many said he used the tragedy as a platform to get money and sympathy and sucker many unsuspecting women into financing his cross-continent partying lifestyle. It was through his prominence in the Missing and Murdered Aboriginal Women campaign that he reportedly conned women into driving him across North America, only to leave them high and dry after bleeding them for their last nickel.
One woman whom he conned into opening her home to him was Jennifer Tourand, a Red River Valley Métis living in London, Ontario who had just completed a grueling bout of chemo treatment for ovarian cancer. He not only took over her house while he was there, he even forced the dying woman to give him her bed while she was made to sleep on an uncomfortable couch. When he had long over-stayed his welcome, the only way she was able to finally get rid of him was to pay for a first class Amtrak ticket for him to get back to Vancouver. Jennifer Tourand is now at death’s door. She says could desperately use the $2,000 that Jayson mooched off of her in food and party money, and the first class train ticket. Tourand now struggles to afford transportation from London to Toronto for the last cancer treatment option available to her since the cancer has returned. It is doubtful that Jayson Fleury will repay her for everything she’s out, now that she really needs it. It’s doubtful that he even cares.
He certainly didn’t care about an utterly impoverished long-term unemployed 43 year-old woman with glaucoma (the author of this article) from the states with no income whatsoever and no access to medical care whom he took to the cleaners for the only money she had left when he abducted her under false promises of friendship and love, only to leave her stranded and abandoned in the middle of downtown Toronto with no money, no gas, no food, no way to get home, and no way to financially recoup. Being without remorse for the irreparable harm inflicted on others is the hallmark of a sociopath. So is being a habitual liar. And this time, the lie was that he’s a “Mohawk warrior.”
Since most of the Occupy Toronto participants are middle class white college kids and well-heeled union leaders, they don’t know who’s who in the Aboriginal community. Most of them don’t even know how it is to live as a marginalized poor white person from the dominant society, let alone grasp what it means to be a marginalized Aboriginal person. And they don’t know about all the different protocols that can be involved in situations like this. It’s pretty easy to pull the wool over their eyes. These well-meaning middle class liberal activists wanted the Aboriginal community to feel welcome and included as part of a social justice movement. Unfortunately, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
It looks like Jayson Fleury and Rick MacRae used the well-meaning and very welcoming Occupy Toronto facilitators for their own agenda under the guise of Aboriginal rights. John Fox, the leader of AIM Ontario who is looked upon as the leader for their group, never denied their claim of being Mohawk warriors, even though he knows better because he knows Jayson and Rick. Fox also abused the goodwill of Occupy Toronto participants when he grew belligerent on the first day because he felt they had slighted him by cutting him off when he ran over the microphone time limit per speaker that event organizers had already predetermined. He lambasted the group for his perceived disrespect on their part, threatening to ban them from Native lands. “When you march, you’re gonna run into me!” Fox screamed at Occupy Toronto organizers. Being an Ojibwe, Fox had no right to threaten to ban the others from Haudenosaunee territory because under the protocols, this would be up to the Haudenosaunee community to do. But the non-Native Occupy activists don’t know this. And they genuinely did not want to offend the Indians. They wanted them to be present and have a voice just like everybody else.
Unfortunately, the antics of the two self-proclaimed Mohawks and AIM Ontario’s John Fox made front page news all across Canada and the US. As a result, supporters of neo-Nazi Gary McHale came out of the woodwork in droves, fueling the fire of racism and rekindling the dying embers of Caledonia, Oka and Ipperwash.



Hey Ezra Levant the ignorant immigrant you’re on Native Land feel free to leave. What happened at Oka and Caledonia was a bunch of slimy weak little shadows of men, much like you, thought they could steal Indian land for development. They duped a whole bunch of white people out of money, but that’s white people stealing from white people and none of our concern. The fatal flaw in the actual attempted land theft, was they thought they were dealing with men such as themselves…but they weren’t… they were dealing with Mohawks… Real Men… and REAL Warriors. If Mohawks truly took over the park in Toronto believe me… you would know it.
“but they weren’t… they were dealing with Mohawks… Real Men… and REAL Warriors. If Mohawks truly took over the park in Toronto believe me… you would know it.”
A backhanded semi-racist putdown containing veiled threats serves no purpose.
Well Mr./Miss/Mrs. ssss ssss, I am going to allow you this one post, if only to correct you on your misguided thinking. But any further comments that can be construed as attacks against Mohawks, the Haudenosaunee, or against other Aboriginal peoples in general will be removed and you will be blocked from further posting on this site, understand? Good.
First off, Charlie was not giving you “a backhanded semi-racist putdown containing veiled threats.” He was posting a response to that idiot Ezra Levant who needs a major attitude readjustment. Charlie was also pointing out that there is a HUGE difference between non-Mohawks claiming to be Mohawks versus the real deal.
Secondly, I see from your ISP that you are in Kitchener, which may be on Haudenosaunee territory. I am going to ask you this once to refrain from posting anything that is counterproductive to the issue of my article. I will not tolerate ANY attacks on my Haudenosaunee friends. Consider this fair warning from me.
Racist??? Have you watched the video clip???
As to veiled threat, I apoligize if I was not clear.
To clarify: My opions are my personal opinions, I do not speak for the Mohawk Nation as ONLY the Mohawk Nation can do that. However as both Oka & Caledonia were citied in your pal Ezra’s Racist Rant I point out the following, The Mohawks actions were in defense of their territory, The Mohawk Nation made every effort to resolve the conflicts by diplomatic means before the situations escalated. The Mohawk Nations movements and actions were done in the light of day, with much preamble, press releases and press conferences. I do apologise for my use of the term “Real Men” as there are also Real Women who will stand for their Nation.
I intended no disrespect to anyone and I apologize if it appeared tht way. However, I am a non-native and to state ” dealing with men such as themselves…but they weren’t… they were dealing with Mohawks… Real Men” suggests that as white men, they are considered lesser of a real man than a native is in fact a mildly racist comment. Secondly to state that the people of Toronto “If Mohawk warriors took over the park, they would know”. How would they know? The comment certainly can be intepreted as a veiled threat or warning. Thirdly, I grew up on in Bruce county and counted many individuals from Saugeen First Nations among my friends and to suggest that I am disrespecting firsts nations people in any way if offensive to me. Again, the gate swings both ways and I was only suggesting that everyone needs to chose their words wisely. As for Ezra Levant, an embarassment and should be muzzled.
I was speaking to the content of their character, it was a statement of fact and I stand by it. Further the fact of the matter is that the attempted land thefts at Oka & Caledonia were perpetrated by rich white men…. political correctness won’t change that, and is the least of my concerns when I feel a Jack Boot on the back of my neck.
How could they know?? It’s Sun Media, it is their job to know and they did know before running the peice because ALL peices set for air are vetted for accuracy before air.
Hi Charlie,
Levant does not understand that he is on Haudenosaunee territory. He also does not know one Aboriginal from another. He’s one of those morons who thinks all Indians are “Mohawks.” I sent him an email requesting that he amend or correct his error in referring to Jayson Fleury and the other two dimbulbs as “Mohawk warriors” and sent him a copy of this article. He has not responded. And yes, what happened there in Caledonia was really this simple: illegally expropriated Haudenosaunee land was sold to a developer (which makes Henco guilty of receiving stolen property), who thumbed his nose at the people from the Six — who tried to educate the developer, the builder, and go through the courts, all to no avail since nobody seemed to “get it.” But that’s the part that conveniently gets left out of the news in mainstream media.
I hate losing my “Zen”, this guy near made me lose my mind.
I won’t let Ezra “the Rant” Levant off the hook in this mess. He has A LOT to answer for with the things he said. That will be my next article
I am saddened by this whole thing. I don’t know MacRay or Fleury, I do however know Jennifer Tourand and what happened to her is inexcusable. That said, I also know John Fox and have found him to be honest and straight forward, he has worked endless hours on First Nations issues under the AIM flag and it would surprise me to find that he knowingly misrepresented himself. I cannot speak as to what actually happened as I was not present, but I can speak as to his “character” and must say I have found John Fox to be an honourable man.
Charlie, you believe John Fox to be an honourable man? After daring suggest he release a press statement refuting SUN Media’s misrepresentions, he banned me from AIM Ontario and AIM Canada, then he personally insulted me knowing I would have no chance to respond. I don’t consider those actions “Honourable”, they are more accurately described as cowardly. Any leader who censors those who he disagrees with narrows his vision, and has ceased to be someone who can be trusted to represent the aims of the people he purports to lead. As I expressed to a follower of his; Do you know the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship? If you’re native, then you understand what a democracy is, because it’s government by the people and for the people. Leaders are there to serve us, and all opinions are listened to and respected. In a dictatorship, the leader is there to serve only himself, and the only opinions listened to are those that the leader agrees with, anyone he disagrees with are banned and censored. Now, what leadership style would you say John Fox has?
I tried to make sure that both Warmington and Levant were corrected on their errors. I sent them an email telling them that those men in the park are not Mohawk warriors and that their stochastic terrorism and their incendiary anti-Aboriginal statements need to be publicly retracted and if he had any questions about it, he could call me and/or email me and I made sure to include my phone number in the email. Neither Warmington nor Levant responded to my email — apparently they’re quite happy to let their otah stand.
However, when one of AIM Ontario’s Facebook members politely suggested to John Fox that he come out publicly and make a press statement challenging Warmington’s article and Levant’s televised rant by saying that Joe Warmington and other Toronto news reporters made a conjecture based on only seeing a flag or two, that AIM Ontario member was abruptly blocked by John Fox. This member then found himself blocked by Fox from AIM Canada as well. You can view the discussion thread about that on my Facebook profile page for yourself.
This raises serious questions, namely, if he (Fox) did not approve of Fleury’s and MacRae’s statements to media about being “Mohawk warriors”, why not openly challenge Joe Warmington and Ezra Levant and call them out on it? Why block a member of AIM Ontario for making a polite common sense suggestion?
I agree, and as you, cannot understand why a statement was not given in response. I sent you a “friend” request and would like to keep in contact as when I researched you a little I came across many articles you have written and found them…. enlightening. And yes I’m native and no I’m not an AIM member… sad to see this.
In the immortal words of Dr. Phil: “What were they thinking?!?!?!”
I have known Jacqueline for a while now, and have not known her to go to pow wows or native events frequently as John Fox suggests. I do know she traveled to an AIM Pow Wow in Michigam with a charleton by the name of Eugene Strong, who tried to pass himself as Pottowatomie. Her purpose in going on this trip was to meet a friend who is dying of ovarian cancer, but found herself stuck at this pow wow that she really wasn’t prepared to attend. Eugene promised to take where her friend was at , so they could spend time together, while Eugene went to the pow wow. Instead she was trapped with Eugene the whole time and never met up with her friend. When his genoelogy was done, it was confirmed that he is not Native at all as all of grandparents are white and not Native. So much for you calling him one of your “men” , a tired out old hippy who wears red and black war paint on his face when he does his new age ceremonies at McKees Rocks Mound in Pa. You think he is involved to protect that mound, think again Eugene is only in it to see how it will benefit himself financially with his interpretative centre. Which by the way is nothing about protecting the mound itself. He cut the Seneca Nation at Alleghany out of the picture, which is where the official NAGPRA office for that area is, by never involving them in the issue. Jacqueline actually traveled to Salamanca to try to alert them of the issue and get the right people involved. Something Eugene never did nor would ever do, as he tried to call them ” Pottowatomie Mounds” which they are not. And John you referance Jacqueline’s many Native boyfriends, which since I have known her has had none. You also site so called experiences that have never existed with her, and again have lied by saying that her story is full of untruths. Here is the truth about you John, you are not the person that you project to other people to be, as many are now seeing because of your censorship when they have posted things on AIM Ontario or your own fb page that you did not want to answer, your immediate reaction was to block them. Sounds like a dictator to me and not a true leader of the people. We also know that AIM Ontario is not an official AIM chapter. You may think that you have ironed everything out, but you have not as you are still on the blacklist with the Clanmothers and Chief Arnie at Six Nations. Chief Arnie wants you to cease and desist what you, Rick MacRae and Jayson Fleury have done and are doing under the name of the Mohawks, Mohawk Warrior Society, and Six Nations Confederacy. You do not speak for us or represent us on our territory.
For those wondering what otah John Fox posted, here is a copy of the posts by him and Jayson Fleury under my article (although there’s some sort of goofy tech support issue where my rebuttal to John Fox is not showing up so hopefully Maggie will be able to get that fixed):
cfnebutterfly
Posted: 2011/11/2 11:44 Updated: 2011/11/2 11:44
Moderator
Joined: 2010/2/12
From:
Posts: 10547
Online!
Re: The No-hawk Occupation of Occupy Toronto | November …
John Fox:
As a spokeperson for Aim Ontario. I feel compelled to respond to Jacqueline S Homan rant entitled “The No-hawk Occupation of Occupy Toronto”. I will not be speaking for others as they have there own voice.
Firstly, i never claimed i was Mohawk nor have ever implied i was. If you view the Toronto Sun video (posted on my site). You will see it was the reporter who implied (several times during the video) Mohawk involvement at Occupy Toronto.
Secondly, for whatever reason i was disrespected at Occupy Toronto. Since then, we aired out our differences and everything is now based on mutual respect, solidarity and unity. We plan on assisting where ever we can with the participants.
Thirdly, the writer of this article by the name of Jacqueline S Homan is a person who frequents pow wows and other native run events. From what i know, she takes up with our native men and at times, those relations do not work out for what ever reason. Fyi, this is Jacqueline S Homan second incident(in the last three months) based around men and how she goes on a tyrant if men reject her. She did the same thing to another activist who was merely defending the burial mounds in America.
Lastly, The writer needs to get her facts straight before she goes on a rant which she has no knowledge of. My impression of this article is nonsense, it is garbage, not factual and has a tone of a personal vendetta on the part of the writer.
J Fox, spoke person-Aim Ontario.
And here is what I tried to post (had difficulty with the posting thing on CFNE site):
1. If you and/or your amigos never said you represented the Mohawks, or Mohawk Warrior Society, then why didn’t you loudly and publicly challenge Joe Warmington for lying when he was down there the first time when Jayson first spoke to him? And why didn’t you publicly challenge him on it when he or his colleague came back to the site yesterday for a [b]second[/b] time? You seem to have no problem seizing the microphone when you want to throw a tantrum in public like a spoiled toddler and demand a bunch of non-Native kids apologize to you for “disrespect” when they did not even know what they did to “disrespect” you because NO ONE ever taught them your protocols before. If you truly came to a mutually respectful understanding with them like you now say you did, great.
2.Why don’t you tell the truth for once? It’s really not that hard. It’s not vector calculus, OK. You say I was at “all these pow-wows and Native-run events”, NAME THEM!
I was to ONE pow-wow (that I had not planned on going to) and the “activist merely defending burial mounds in America” you mention, you conveniently omitted the fact that he was a non-Native plastic shaman named Eugene Strong who violated NAGPRA as well as Haudenosaunee protocols and scammed the public into giving him monetary donations to BUY the McKees Rocks Mounds (which are Iroquoian, NOT Algonquin as Strong claimed). Since when is “buying the sacred” to turn it into a for-profit, tax-exempt tourist attraction with living quarters on it “protecting” it?
3. So who are all these multitudes of Native men you claim I’ve had relationships with that ” didn’t work out” with or that “rejected” me? Gee, you make it out like I’ve had more lovers than Elizabeth Taylor or Zsa Zsa Gabor. Are you jealous that I can get more boyfriends than you, or something?
Sorry to disappoint you, but I don’t have time for such a busy dating life that you’d like to credit me for: I’ve been too busy going after un-licensed archeologists who think they’re Indiana Jones that submit fraudulent reports and traffick Aboriginal cultural property (including skeletal remains) keeping Skinheads and BMXers out of mound sites.
4. Also, do you care to explain why you block people on your FB pages who DID support you and who were AIM Ontario members simply because they made polite suggestions, only for you to then insult them behind their backs where they can’t defend themselves because they’ve been blocked?
5. Why don’t you prove that what I wrote was untrue about yours, Rick’s and Jayson’s shenanigans instead of lobbing ad hominem attacks and personal insults on forums that I cannot access (your Facebook pages) and publicly defend myself against your otah.
I think you need to clean up your act, straighten up, and fly right before you talk smack about anyone else.
What’s to the Toronto Occupation? Why is it taking place? Why would someone believe it to be important to ake place on Six Nations Territory? Toronto was another place of Adverse Occupation. How do the white people and all the Foreiners like it when people unknown to them revisit their lands of worship. If I were to go to anywhere else in the world I would not just show up especially without first researching the indigenous people of the land, not foreigners such as I would be visiting another land. Did you notice how kept saying, visit, well, I can’t imagine calling soewhere else my home. I was given one home, Turtle Island. And I’ll always be here, but I will not stop living, I will visit those places I am destined to visit and to gather wisdom to bring home, so we as well can expand our understanding of the world. Nau waea (thx)
Has anyone applied for a fire permit? This would be an ideal place for a sacred fire where people could go for healing and to talk or drum. As long as people were willing to volunteer their time to be fire keepers, having a sacred fire would be a positive thing. That would be a show of native support for the protest but it would not make it a native protest. What do other people think?
I think it’s up to the Haudenosaunee because it’s their territory. But it’s not just the fire. It’s these other problems surrounding those three guys. Namely Jayson because he has ripped off a lot of people; most of them poor and unable to recoup.
Just a note for people’s edification here. Toronto is not Haudenosaunee traditional land, but rather Missasauga, land. To which point the Canadain Government has already admitted in court that half of the city was stolen from the Missasaugas under false prentense. Haudenosaunee traditional land is in US territory. Queen Victoria granted her “loyal subjects” the Haldimand tract (the 6 miles either side of the Grand River from its head waters to its end at the lake), because they lost their homelands for taking the side of the British during the revolution. So please do us all a favor and know your history before you claim lands for Nations to whom it is not legally nor traditionally theirs. That is as bad as the immigrants who stole our children, and claimed our lands as theirs because they “discovered” a new world.
Heather: There are many Haudenosaunee elders and teachers who beg to differ, and it seems that their history is supported by a few non-Native and other Native sources as well. And these Haudenosaunee elders have an entire library worth of info about this in their homes, just so you know.
From an email request from Nikki Maracle, a Bear Clan Mohawk from Akwesasne who is weighing in here, I will post this to Heather as Nikki has asked me to:
Toronto is Haudenosaunee Traditional Land and not Mississauga Land is this Heather Kanderz, a misguided person claims. Toronto is derived from an Iroquoian word, Ontario, and Canada are also all derived from the Iroquoian language. So far there have been no Mississauga burials found in the Toronto area. On the other hand there are 100′s and thousands of Haudenosaunee Burials and village sites found in the Toronto area. Something according to Heather’s misguided history, for us to have outnumbered the Mississuaga’s 1000 to 1 on the North side of Lake Ontario for never living here prior to 1784. Again is Heather another person that needs to learn to live quietly here in our territory and respect the law of the land, which is the Great Law of Peace.
http://taiaiakon.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/fraudulent-land-claim-mississauga-and-toronto_.pdf
Oneh
The North Side of Lake Ontario and lands North are known as Huronia which were the territories of the Wendat/Huronia Nation and other relatives of the Haudenasaunee. These Huronia/Wendat Nations were being constantly attacked by the Warring 5 Nations. Today the Mohawk People of Tyendinaga north east of Lake Ontario believe that their community on Eagle Hill is the birth place of Deganawida, The Peacemaker, who was a Huron/Wendat.
If the Peacemaker was Huron and the messenger of the Great Law of Peace, why are the Huron Nation not a recognized Nation within the Confederacy? Was not the Great Law of Peace for all Indigenous Nations?
The Wendat/ Huron were allies to the Northern Anishinabek Nation Peoples of Lake Superior Area. In the 1600′s when some Nations of the Haudenasaunee 5 Nations Confederacy were invading Huronia and killing their own relatives it was the allies of the Huron/Wendat who are the Anishinabe, Ojibway, Missisauga, Odawa who are the Three Fires Confederacy that pushed back the warring 5 Nations back to their original territories south of Lake Ontario. Even though these warriors of 5 Nations were cooperating with European Nations where they were given guns, the strength of the Ojibway and Missisauga armed with traditional weaponry were able to defend these lands of their allies the Wendat. That is why Nations of the Three Fires Confederacy now occupy these lands in these areas.
Queen Victoria granted her “loyal subjects” members of the Six Nations, the Haldimand tract (the 6 miles either side of the Grand River from its head waters to its end at the lake), because they lost their homelands for taking the side of the British during the revolution.
These Three Stooges plus hArriosn helcrow are people that need to be confronted by the Indigenous Community as whole no matter whose Territory they are on. Remember the message of Confederacy from Deganiweda and the Unity Flag made by Louis Hall of Kahnawake. Under one Sun all the Nations of Turtle Island will come together with one mind and one heart. Don’t play into being divisive if you share different perspectives, then the dividers will win
“The North Side of Lake Ontario and lands North are known as Huronia which were the territories of the Wendat/Huronia Nation and other relatives of the Haudenasaunee. These Huronia/Wendat Nations were being constantly attacked by the Warring 5 Nations. Today the Mohawk People of Tyendinaga north east of Lake Ontario believe that their community on Eagle Hill is the birth place of Deganawida, The Peacemaker, who was a Huron/Wendat.
If the Peacemaker was Huron and the messenger of the Great Law of Peace, why are the Huron Nation not a recognized Nation within the Confederacy? Was not the Great Law of Peace for all Indigenous Nations?
The Wendat/ Huron were allies to the Northern Anishinabek Nation Peoples of Lake Superior Area. In the 1600′s when some Nations of the Haudenasaunee 5 Nations Confederacy were invading Huronia and killing their own relatives it was the allies of the Huron/Wendat who are the Anishinabe, Ojibway, Missisauga, Odawa who are the Three Fires Confederacy that pushed back the warring 5 Nations back to their original territories south of Lake Ontario. Even though these warriors of 5 Nations were cooperating with European Nations where they were given guns, the strength of the Ojibway and Missisauga armed with traditional weaponry were able to defend these lands of their allies the Wendat. That is why Nations of the Three Fires Confederacy now occupy these lands in these areas. “
You are only particially accurate in your post . The Area north of Lake of Ontario was not known as Huronia until the arrival of the French explorers. As a matter of fact, the word Huron was not even used before the coming of the French as it is a derogatory name given to the people living on the penninsula between the 3 Lakes.
Wendat means people of the floating land ot penninsula. So originally Wendat was not just one group of people specifically, until the French came. They gave the Wendat the name Huron, to differentiate between them and the rest of the 5 Nations. Little did they know that many 5 five nations people had been lving north of Lake Ontario for centuries, as many village sites in the Toronto area are shared village sites, not just Huron/Wendat. So the name Wendat was originally applied to anyone living North of Ontario that lived in Longhouses. Many of the Huron/Wendat as the French called them migrated into the Toronto area from the east as Stadachona, Hochialaga, and all their major villages were moved to the west in the Mid 1500′s , that filled the vacuum caused by the upheaval of the Erie/Neutrals due to disease decimation brought by the French. The same started to happen to the what the French call Huron/Wendat, and they moved to the west to get away from the diseases that were decimating their populations upward to 80%. It ceratinly sounds to me like you have reading too much French Jesuit propaganda that has been taught widely, and this kind of hate literature towards the Haudenosaunee is one of the major things that us caused our people much grief in Ontario. The Five nations are not immigrants from New York, as our people have been here for centuries lving under the Graet Law of Peace with the others that have also been here.
As far as the Great Peacemaker goes, he was not Huron/Wendat, as when the Great Peacemaker was born there were no people identified as Huron/Wendat. From our own elders it is said the Great Peacemaker was born over 2,000 years ago
. What became known as the Huron/Wendat were also very closely allied with the Seneca and Mohawk, and the Huron/Wendat language is a combination of the Onondaga and Mohawk Language. Yes they may have been allies with some of the Anishnawbek nations, but you make it sound as if they were never allied with any of the 5 Nations which is very far from the truth. Please get your facts straight about our history before you post more French Jesuit propaganda that can easily be contested.
As far as Harrison goes and the 3 stooges goes our Chiefs want them to cease and desist what they are doing, and stop identifying as Mohawks and Mohawk Warriors.
Oneh
There is something to what Anishinabek Okijida says. Have you ever read The Ojibwa of southern Ontario by Peter S. Schmalz? It goes into some detail about the war between the Anishinabe 3 Fires Confederacy and the Iroquois. Essentially the Iroquois were defeated and were pushed back to New York. The 1701 treaty you mentioned was the treaty that ended that war. You can find the salient details linked below, but for a complete and true understanding of these events, you really should read Peter Schmalz’s book. http://theplainsofaamjiwnaang.wordpress.com/2010/01/
Pingback: Solidarity for the Few « Feminism — The Other "F" Word
Jayson Fleury gets arrested on Tuesday, November 15.
http://www.cfne.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=11125
Jayson is in this video waving a flag, and in a couple of the photos from earlier in the day.
http://www.torontosun.com/2011/11/15/occupy-toronto-ordered-out
I believe the fire is gone from St. James Park.
@ C. Printup You wrote, ” Not correct. The Haudenosuanee at Six Nations are there because the British Crown purchased those lands from the Mississauga for them to have a place to settle after the U.S. Revolutionary War. It was only “Haundenosaunee” territory for a brief time after the Seneca (another tribe from the Confederacy) killed off and captured the Huron, Petun and Neutral tribes that were living there in the 1600′s. Shortly after that the Haudenosaunee were driven out and back to the U.S. side by the Ojibway, Mississauga, Huron and French. It is Mississauga /Ojibwa territory as the treaties made with the British in the late 1700′s and 1800′s clearly show.”
You are wrong C. Printup as archaeology evidence has proven that there has been Seneca people living in the Humber Valley for Centuries. There are many shared village sites in the Toronto area, and not just exclusively Huron/Wendat. The Seneca people have been living in the Toronto area as far back as 1150 AD. And the Erie/Neutrals, Wenro, and Seneca living together at many village sites. It sounds to me like you are another person promoting the lies learned by Jesuits. We did not kill off the Huron, Petun and Neutral. As many of these people are still alive today and known by different names. The Huron you refer to live in Quebec City and are known as the Wendat of Wendake, Que. The Petuns and Nuetrals you refer to are known as Wynadotte of Anderdon, Oklahoma Wyandot, and Wyandot of Kansas. There were also a number of Erie/Neutrals that were taken into the Five Nations through adoption or marriage. So no these people you refer to are not killed off by us. Again as Jacquleine mentioned what about the 1701? The 1701 Peace Treaty of Monteral, was a treaty to protect a land area 1200 x 2400 square miles from any further loss. No the Mississauga, Ojibway and French did not drive us back to the US side, as we have still continued to hunt, fish, trap, and live on both sides of the imaginary line for generations and still do so today. Also the Mississauga chiefs at the time when the Haldimand Tract was purchased, stated that they did not own the land they were selling to the British. That’s why Joseph Brant refused to buy the land from the Mississauga because they are not the legitimate title holders to the land. The land given to the Six Nations for them to live on, was already a part of the 1701 Peace Treaty of Montreal. The Six Nations are leaders of that treaty and still remain as such today. All of the Grand River was previously Erie/Neutral homeland and the Mississauga only came there in the mid 1700′s at the invitation of the Six Nations. They became part of the Cayuga Nation, as a whole nation. The Cayuga Nation still holds their wampum for them. The Mississaugas were not a part of the 1701 Peace Treaty because they were not a nation of people in 1701. The Mississauga are really renegade Ojibwa, who left the 3 fires, in 1740 when they moved south and settled in Southern Ontario. During the 1780′s just prior to the selling of the land to the British, they broke away from the Confederacy, and are an entity on their own in order to set themselves up as the Indigenous middlemen to deal with the British in ceding vast amounts of land in Southern Ontario. All these land deals are fraudulent, and illegal because of the breaking of the 1701 Peace Treaty and the Royal Proclamation of 1763. So therefore the Toronto Purchase is a fraudulent land deal made with a group of people that had no right to cede the land in the first place. The 1701 Peace Treaty was signed by 40 Indigenous Nations, so therefore the Mississauga would have had to have consent from all of those nations to cede the land, which they did not. This is why the Six Nations does not support these fraudulent land claims in their territory. So it is not Mississauga/Ojibway territory as you claim. Where is the proof of their ancestors being buried in the Toronto area? They have none so far, meanwhile we have proof of thousands of our ancestors being buried in the Toronto area. So whose land is it? It’s not Mississauga land.
http://taiaiakon.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/fraudulent-land-claim-mississauga-and-toronto_.pdf
@ Dogsoldier 40 , you quoted, ” There is something to what Anishinabek Okijida says. Have you ever read The Ojibwa of southern Ontario by Peter S. Schmalz? It goes into some detail about the war between the Anishinabe 3 Fires Confederacy and the Iroquois. Essentially the Iroquois were defeated and were pushed back to New York. The 1701 treaty you mentioned was the treaty that ended that war. You can find the salient details linked below, but for a complete and true understanding of these events, you really should read Peter Schmalz’s book. ”
And who is Peter Schmalz, another pro- Anishnawbek source, that basis his writings on twisted history. The Iroquois were not defeated and pushed back to New York as you claim. There are many of us that continued to live here, hunt, fish, trap, and trade here well after the 1701 and into the present day. The 1701 was a treaty to protect from any further losses, which meant that any gains made by the Anishnawbek before then was null and void by the treaty itself. The so called gains you speak of Dogsoldier 40 do not apply today, because the 1701 protects a land mass 1200 x 2400 sq miles of any loss of sovereignty or use by any of the 40 nations you signed onto which includes the Six Nations who are the lead negotiators of the treaty. You need to get over that fact.
Have you read ” The Great Peace of Montreal of 1701″ by Gilles Havard? It’s a concise record of the 1701 , and the negotiations leading up to the signing of the 1701 Peace Treaty of Montreal. I strongly suggest you read this book before making anymore ridiculous pro-Anishnawbek comments that can easily be contested.
http://taiaiakon.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/fraudulent-land-claim-mississauga-and-toronto_.pdf
Peter Schmaltz is a historian and writer who has written 2 books on the Ojibwa. His writings are well sourced through historical documents and oral history. Here is a link to the notes on The Ojibwa of southern Ontario: http://books.google.ca/books?id=espKE9_839wC&pg=PA267&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false The Iroquois WERE defeated. The Three Fires Confederacy swept down from the north in 4 divisions and destroyed the Iroquois in detail. It was the Iroquois that sued for peace and as you say, wanted to protect themselves from further losses. The Misssissaugas of course were a part of this campaign, and are signatories to the Treaty of 1701. Did you actually read any of the information I posted in that link? These are not as you say, “French lies”. These accounts are well documented. Here is another article: http://cacouna.net/paixmtl1701_e.htm “Algonquin oral tradition contends that the combined forces of the Ojibwa, Ottawa and Potawatomi inflicted great losses on the Iroquois and drove them out of southern Ontario by the end of the century. By 1699, New York’s governor, the Earl of Bellomont, wrote that the French allies were at the point of “totally destroying” the Iroquois. Later that year, an Iroquois orator called upon Calliere for a reprieve. “I ask you my father, to stop your allies who every day are among us breaking heads,” he implored” You would agree that had not the Iroquois been close to the point of destruction, they would never have asked for a peace treaty. I’ve read a great deal about the 1701 agreement. Nowhere have I found any terms stating the Iroquois had claim to southern Ontario, save for hunting. Remember, at the end of the wars it was the Three Fires Confederacy – not the Iroquois – that held dominion over southern Ontario. It was by right of this possession that enabled the Mississauga to make claims for this land.
Dogsoldier 40 wrote, ” dogsoldier40 on November 19, 2011 at 8:00 pm said:
“Peter Schmaltz is a historian and writer who has written 2 books on the Ojibwa. His writings are well sourced through historical documents and oral history. Here is a link to the notes on The Ojibwa of southern Ontario: http://books.google.ca/books?id=espKE9_839wC&pg=PA267&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false The Iroquois WERE defeated. The Three Fires Confederacy swept down from the north in 4 divisions and destroyed the Iroquois in detail. It was the Iroquois that sued for peace and as you say, wanted to protect themselves from further losses. The Misssissaugas of course were a part of this campaign, and are signatories to the Treaty of 1701. Did you actually read any of the information I posted in that link? These are not as you say, “French lies”. These accounts are well documented. Here is another article: http://cacouna.net/paixmtl1701_e.htm “Algonquin oral tradition contends that the combined forces of the Ojibwa, Ottawa and Potawatomi inflicted great losses on the Iroquois and drove them out of southern Ontario by the end of the century. By 1699, New York’s governor, the Earl of Bellomont, wrote that the French allies were at the point of “totally destroying” the Iroquois. Later that year, an Iroquois orator called upon Calliere for a reprieve. “I ask you my father, to stop your allies who every day are among us breaking heads,” he implored” You would agree that had not the Iroquois been close to the point of destruction, they would never have asked for a peace treaty. I’ve read a great deal about the 1701 agreement. Nowhere have I found any terms stating the Iroquois had claim to southern Ontario, save for hunting. Remember, at the end of the wars it was the Three Fires Confederacy – not the Iroquois – that held dominion over southern Ontario. It was by right of this possession that enabled the Mississauga to make claims for this land.”
The Mississaugas are not signatories of the Great Peace of Montreal. Here is a list of signers of the 1701, no Mississauga listed at all. They were not a nation of people at that time, and were not known as Mississauga until they moved themselves into Southern Ontario . Their name means ” people of the River Mouths”.
http://taiaiakon.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/1701-signers.pdf
The Iroquois were never to tally destroyed as what happened to us in the late 1600′s only stirred up a hornets and later led to the defeat of the French and their allies. I will also cite another source, ” His Majesty’s Indian Allies”, British Indian Policy in Defense of Canada, 1774-1815, by Robert S. Allen. ” In July of 1701 the confederacy further strengthened the alliance with the British, by signing a “Deed in Trust” m to the King of England. As allies, the Iroquois who had suffered losses in defense of Britain’s northern colonies against New France, decided at this of crisis to place their beaver hunting grounds under the protection of of the English Crown. The sachems intend only that the King ” might be their Protector and Defender.” There was never any thought that the deed represented a surrender of territory or sovereignty” So again you wrong Dogsoldier 40, the Iroquois still hold dominion over Southern Ontario and that was also agreed upon by the British. Any gains made by the 3 fires, became null and void through the 1701 Treaty and the Iroquois Beaver Hunting Grounds sill remained intact and we have never given up sovereignty to the land. And whatever the Mississauga thought that made them enabled to make claims for the land, is based upon illegal and fraudulent land deals with the British because of the agreement that was made with the British, French, and the 40 Indigenous Nations who signed the treaty and the Mississauga not being one of them.
http://taiaiakon.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/fraudulent-land-claim-mississauga-and-toronto_.pdf
http://taiaiakon.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/royal-proclamation-of-1763.pdf
http://www.mohawknationnews.com/news/singlenews.php?lang=en&layout=mnn&category=58&newsnr=596&srcscript=/news/news.php
We have much more resources that we can relate to support the fact that Toronto is not Mississauga land and that any land claims made for Toronto and Southern Ontario are illegal, fraudulent and invalid. The Clanmothers and Chiefs and Six Nations do not support any land claims in their Beaver Hunting Ground area.
You wrote: “Now, MacRae is embroiled in another sacred fire mishap in a tiny park at the Occupy Toronto camp. Since Toronto sits within Haudenosaunee territory, which spans from southern Ontario to upstate New York, most of Pennsylvania, part of the Ohio Valley, and reaching as far south as Mingo County, West Virginia, there are protocols that must be followed regarding sacred fires that are lit by someone claiming to speak for the Iroquois peoples.”
Not correct. The Haudenosuanee at Six Nations are there because the British Crown purchased those lands from the Mississauga for them to have a place to settle after the U.S. Revolutionary War. It was only “Haundenosaunee” territory for a brief time after the Seneca (another tribe from the Confederacy) killed off and captured the Huron, Petun and Neutral tribes that were living there in the 1600′s. Shortly after that the Haudenosaunee were driven out and back to the U.S. side by the Ojibway, Mississauga, Huron and French. It is Mississauga /Ojibwa territory as the treaties made with the British in the late 1700′s and 1800′s clearly show.
What about the 1701 Treaty?
@ C. Printup You wrote, ” Not correct. The Haudenosuanee at Six Nations are there because the British Crown purchased those lands from the Mississauga for them to have a place to settle after the U.S. Revolutionary War. It was only “Haundenosaunee” territory for a brief time after the Seneca (another tribe from the Confederacy) killed off and captured the Huron, Petun and Neutral tribes that were living there in the 1600′s. Shortly after that the Haudenosaunee were driven out and back to the U.S. side by the Ojibway, Mississauga, Huron and French. It is Mississauga /Ojibwa territory as the treaties made with the British in the late 1700′s and 1800′s clearly show.”
You are wrong C. Printup as archaeology evidence has proven that there has been Seneca people living in the Humber Valley for Centuries. There are many shared village sites in the Toronto area, and not just exclusively Huron/Wendat. The Seneca people have been living in the Toronto area as far back as 1150 AD. And the Erie/Neutrals, Wenro, and Seneca living together at many village sites. It sounds to me like you are another person promoting the lies learned by Jesuits. We did not kill off the Huron, Petun and Neutral. As many of these people are still alive today and known by different names. The Huron you refer to live in Quebec City and are known as the Wendat of Wendake, Que. The Petuns and Nuetrals you refer to are known as Wynadotte of Anderdon, Oklahoma Wyandot, and Wyandot of Kansas. There were also a number of Erie/Neutrals that were taken into the Five Nations through adoption or marriage. So no these people you refer to are not killed off by us. Again as Jacquleine mentioned what about the 1701? The 1701 Peace Treaty of Monteral, was a treaty to protect a land area 1200 x 2400 square miles from any further loss. No the Mississauga, Ojibway and French did not drive us back to the US side, as we have still continued to hunt, fish, trap, and live on both sides of the imaginary line for generations and still do so today. Also the Mississauga chiefs at the time when the Haldimand Tract was purchased, stated that they did not own the land they were selling to the British. That’s why Joseph Brant refused to buy the land from the Mississauga because they are not the legitimate title holders to the land. The land given to the Six Nations for them to live on, was already a part of the 1701 Peace Treaty of Montreal. The Six Nations are leaders of that treaty and still remain as such today. All of the Grand River was previously Erie/Neutral homeland and the Mississauga only came there in the mid 1700′s at the invitation of the Six Nations. They became part of the Cayuga Nation, as a whole nation. The Cayuga Nation still holds their wampum for them. The Mississaugas were not a part of the 1701 Peace Treaty because they were not a nation of people in 1701. The Mississauga are really renegade Ojibwa, who left the 3 fires, in 1740 when they moved south and settled in Southern Ontario. During the 1780′s just prior to the selling of the land to the British, they broke away from the Confederacy, and are an entity on their own in order to set themselves up as the Indigenous middlemen to deal with the British in ceding vast amounts of land in Southern Ontario. All these land deals are fraudulent, and illegal because of the breaking of the 1701 Peace Treaty and the Royal Proclamation of 1763. So therefore the Toronto Purchase is a fraudulent land deal made with a group of people that had no right to cede the land in the first place. The 1701 Peace Treaty was signed by 40 Indigenous Nations, so therefore the Mississauga would have had to have consent from all of those nations to cede the land, which they did not. This is why the Six Nations does not support these fraudulent land claims in their territory. So it is not Mississauga/Ojibway territory as you claim. Where is the proof of their ancestors being buried in the Toronto area? They have none so far, meanwhile we have proof of thousands of our ancestors being buried in the Toronto area. So whose land is it? It’s not Mississauga land.
http://taiaiakon.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/fraudulent-land-claim-mississauga-and-toronto_.pdf
Toronto is Tkaronto – it’s a Mohawk word.
Read Terri Monture’s article on it: http://redindiangirl.blogspot.com/2011/10/listen-all-of-you.html
They also made a film on Tkaronto